42 found
Order:
  1.  20
    Information value and stimulus configuring as factors in conditioned reinforcement.David R. Thomas, David L. Berman & George E. Serednesky - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (2p1):181.
  2.  18
    Effects of extradimensional training on stimulus generalization.David R. Thomas, Frederick Freeman, John G. Svinicki, D. E. Scott Burr & Joseph Lyons - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (1p2):1.
  3.  16
    Discrimination learning as a function of prior discrimination and nondifferential training.Kenneth O. Eck, Richard C. Noel & David R. Thomas - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (1p1):156.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  11
    Stimulus generalization as a function of level of motivation.David R. Thomas & Richard A. King - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (5):323.
  5.  29
    Stimulus generalization as a function of the frame of reference.David R. Thomas & Charles G. Jones - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):77.
  6.  33
    Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer: III. The new learning method.Salvatore C. Caronite & David R. Thomas - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):385.
  7.  17
    Generalization slope as a function of the density of variable interval reinforcement.Gregory A. Davitt, James F. Dickson, Kimbal L. Wheatley & David R. Thomas - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (2):162-164.
  8.  23
    Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization for human subjects.Theodore J. Doll & David R. Thomas - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):508.
  9.  21
    Discrimination learning as a function of prior discrimination and nondifferential training: A replication.Kenneth O. Eck & David R. Thomas - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (3p1):511.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  22
    Effect of test stimulus range on stimulus generalization in human subjects.Gary Hansen, Arthur Tomie, David R. Thomas & Doris H. Thomas - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (4):634.
  11.  22
    Stimulus generalization as a function of testing procedure and response measure.Richard H. Hiss & David R. Thomas - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (6):587.
  12.  11
    Differential effects of continuous extinction and discrimination training on the generalization gradient.Werner K. Honig, David R. Thomas & Norman Guttman - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (2):145.
  13.  29
    Stimulus generalization following fixed interval training.Dorothy S. Konick & David R. Thomas - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (4):689.
  14.  27
    Effects of interdimensional training on stimulus generalization: II. Within-subjects design.Joseph Lyons & David R. Thomas - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):572.
  15.  18
    Influence of postural distortion on the perception of visual vertical in pigeons.Joseph Lyons & David R. Thomas - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (1p1):120.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  19
    Pavlovian vs. operant factors in nonspecific transfer of training in the pigeon.Robert J. Newlin & David R. Thomas - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 16 (4):251-254.
  17.  17
    Asymmetry of training effects in nonspecific transfer of training.Jack E. Sherman, Leha Robles & David R. Thomas - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (3):165-168.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  22
    Effects of interdimensional training on stimulus generalization.Richard W. Switalski, Joseph Lyons & David R. Thomas - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (5):661.
  19.  12
    Adaptation level as a factor in human discrimination learning and stimulus generalization.David R. Thomas, Marilla D. Svinicki & Janice Vogt - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (2):210.
  20.  9
    Adaptation level and the central tendency effect in stimulus generalization.David R. Thomas, Harry Strub & James F. Dickson - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (3):466.
  21.  9
    A model for adaptation-level effects on stimulus generalization.David R. Thomas - 1993 - Psychological Review 100 (4):658-673.
  22.  23
    A test of the "units hypothesis" employing wave-length generalization in human subjects.David R. Thomas & Richard H. Hiss - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):59.
  23.  14
    Conditional discrimination learning by pigeons: The role of training paradigms.David R. Thomas & Horace Goldberg - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (3):256-258.
  24.  20
    Comparison of stimulus generalization following variable-ratio and variable-interval training.David R. Thomas & Richard W. Switalski - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):236.
  25.  9
    Effects of interdimensional training on stimulus generalization: An extension.David R. Thomas & Kimbal L. Wheatley - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1080.
  26.  15
    Mediated generalization via stimulus labeling: A replication and extension.David R. Thomas, Alberta D. Caronite, Gary L. LaMonica & Kenneth L. Hoving - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (3p1):531.
  27.  19
    Masking of stimulus control during generalization testing.David R. Thomas, Marilla D. Svinicki & John G. Svinicki - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (3):479.
  28.  21
    Role of preexperimental experience in the development of stimulus control.David R. Thomas, Robert W. Mariner & Gayle Sherry - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):375.
  29.  42
    Role of stimulus labeling in stimulus generalization.David R. Thomas & Alberta Decapito - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (6):913.
  30.  29
    Role of stimulus comparison in equivalence training.David R. Thomas, James T. Miller & Gary Hansen - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 96 (2):297.
  31.  16
    Stimulus generalization as a function of the number and range of generalization test stimuli.David R. Thomas & George Bistey - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (6):599.
  32.  16
    Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer: II. Effects of discrimination training.David R. Thomas & Salvatore C. Caronite - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4):402.
  33.  24
    Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer: IV. Concurrent generalization of reinforcing and discriminative stimulus functions following fixed-interval training.David R. Thomas & Donald V. Derosa - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (2):260.
  34.  23
    Stimulus labeling, adaptation level, and the central tendency shift.David R. Thomas & Doris H. Thomas - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (5):896.
  35.  22
    Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning: An alternative interpretation.David R. Thomas, D. E. Burr & Kenneth O. Eck - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):53.
  36.  16
    The effects of drive and discrimination training on stimulus generalization.David R. Thomas - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):24.
  37.  24
    The law of effect: Contingency or contiguity.David R. Thomas - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (3):470.
  38.  17
    The role of response directedness in discriminative and conditional stimulus control.David R. Thomas & Patrick J. Curran - 1988 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (4):378-380.
  39.  18
    Adaptation level as a factor in human wavelength generalization.Arthur Tomie & David R. Thomas - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (1):29.
  40.  26
    Role of stimulus similarity in equivalence training.Arthur Tomie, Gregory A. Davitt & David R. Thomas - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1):146.
  41.  20
    An analysis of the relationship between behavioral contrast and responding to S− in successive discrimination learning.Robert L. Welker, Charles F. Hickis, David R. Thomas & James F. Dickson - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (3):205-208.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  11
    Topographically tagged stimulus control: Maintained generalization and stimulus-specific gradients.K. Geoffrey White & David R. Thomas - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13 (5):275-278.